Friday, July 12, 2013

If the Camel Changes gender

أجمد من كتف الثور ۔۔۔ صدغ الجمل (إذا استنوق الجمل)

د۔ محمد علي الحضيري ۔۔ أستاذ الإقتصاد في جامعة كانساس بالولايات المتحدة الأمريكية
لورنس كانساس  ١٣-٧-٢٠١٣
بهذا يعبر أهل قريتنا عن تقززهم من تبجح من هو مغرق في اٰلخزي (ومن بالإحتجاب ممن
هو ممتطى؟ ممن هو منبطح؟) ويسوقون المثل بسلوكيات محمود البنوتة و حافظ حفيظة۔
لم تكتف النخبة المقززة الفاشلة (أسد عليّ وفي الحروب نعامةٌ ۔۔ منذ البخت نصر۔۔ أليس
كذلك؟) بأن صادرت إرادة شعب مصر إذ أقالت رئيسه المدنيّ المنتخب (لأول في تاريخ مصر
ذي  السنوات العشرة آلاف)۔ لم تكتف بفعلتها تلك التي فعلت بل استصدرت أمرًا بالتحقيق مع
الرجل بتهمة هروبه من سجن زُج فيه دون أن توجه إليه تهمة ناهيك بأن يصدر ضده حكم
محكمة۔ تري من أزجى قفص اديوك الرومية۔ ‘نتن يا هو’ بدون أدنى شك!

القول في هذه النخبة المقززة

المستقرئ لتاريخ مصر الطويل لا يغيب عن حسه وجود أقلية نهمة متبجحة تأكل ولا
تعمل يدعون أنفسهم عليةَ القوم وأماثلَ الناس و يقولون أنهم النخبة , تعولهم أغلبية صابرة
مثابرة عاملة لا تأكل وتسمى من باب التمني بالقرى المنتجة وتقوم قيامة النخبة المقززة ويلقون
علينا زجاجات المولوتوف ثم الرصاص الحي (الذي يتخصص في اسالة دماء المصريين دون
غيرهم) إذا التقطنا من بين مخلفات موائدهم ما قد يذكرنا بنكهة الطعام۔
والنخبة, أصلحك الله, قد تتنزل علينا كالجراد عجماً وأعراباً رتركاً و ۔۔ وفرنجة وغير ذلك من
إفرازات البيئات المتحللة العفنة وقد تبرز من بين مخلفاتنا نحن وآنئذ تلتصق بالدخلاء من
سادتها وهي تتشور عبثاً لتتخلص من رائحتها النفاذة۔
قال المبدع أحمد  فؤاد نجم (وغناها البديع الشيخ إمام): ‘ما دام بحر وارد وجاي م الصِّعيد ۔۔
تزيد الموارد, كروشهم تزيد ’ ۔۔ ولكن البحر لم يعد واردًا بفضل الشقيقة الحبشية (أنا ما
كسروني) وتعني سد النهضة وتموله قبائل البدو أمهات الزيت العبق۔ فمن أين تحصل النخبة
المقززة علي عصير القرى المنتجة؟ لعلها تفعل كما فعل أهل باريس من الفرنجة منذ قرنين من
الزمان إذ شاعت بينهم ’مودة‘ احتساء شراب مسحوق المومياءات من اجدادي (استهلك هؤلاء
الفضلاء المتحضرين تلالاً من الموتى المحنطين من مرمدة بني سلامة ۔۔ على مرآى من بيتنا
سابقا على جسر النيل سابقا أيضًا) لعلها تمد في أعمارهم لكي ينشروا التنور والمعرفة بين
الهمج الهمل من افريقيا الى الهند الصينية (كل ما هو مؤهل للإستيطان أرض عماليق وهنود)۔
أقول: لعل النخبة المقززة تجففنا بطريقة عصرية أمريكية مبتكرة ثم تستهلكنا مع التحبيش
بقليل من المايونيز بالشامبنيون والكاتشب (والذي لا يفهم المصطلحات الأخيرة متخلف صالح
للإستهلاك الآدميِّ المتحضر۔ والله الموفق۔ ودمتم۔

Sunday, November 30, 2008

The Great All American Cover Up

The Great All-American Cover Up
Who really caused the financial meltdown?

I am perfectly aware of the cosmological pitfalls, think Lot’s wife, that attend looking back. Nevertheless; I need to be aware how we got here before guessing about how to get our collective heads above water for a breath. Furthermore, my step grandmother, Sitty Zeinab, informed me thus: ”they asked the pharaoh what made him such a despot and he replied: ‘No one stopped me’ …” . So here is to maybe we can stop them.
Hapless households looking to own a house for a house, or indulging in speculation so they can get a piece of the easy money mountain, did not cause financial meltdown. It is simply and outrageously the managers of hedge funds in cooperation with investment bankers. But no one (ABSOLUTELY NO ONE) is even hinting at that possibility. It is an outrageous conspiracy of silence. Here is the scenario: Hedge fund manager commissions investment banker to create a fabulous loan package. The banker collects hundreds of millions in fees (that does not appear as net income to the bank because they are paid out as bonus and wages to the loan arranging experts). Banks that made the loan go again to in vestment banker who securitizes the loans and says: let there be derivatives. And derivatives happen. Professors of finance and of financial economics write scientific papers about the optimality of derivatives from a societal well being vantage points. And the papers are published and the professors get merit salary increases in their pay which are irreversible even if you find that the papers are wrong later. And economics/business columnists who live on yet another planet, write economics/business columns simplifying (selling) for the rest of us dummies and the columnists write books that are widely purchased and quoted by other journalists and they too become rich. The hedge fund mangers are managing other millionaires’ money in the total privacy of their private equity .caves And they meet in international waters. And they are beyond approach. And they make tons of money for themselves. They buy publicly traded companies and make them private equity companies and then they (that will be the hedge fund managers) gut the company and then said company defaults on the loan. And then we have a credit crunch because the loan pool has been dried out by the hedge fund manager unconstrained borrowing, by our government fighting a preventive war on credit, and by insurance companies using the float (part of the pool isn’t it) to buy bad loans that they nothing about how to asses the default risk on.

Quite a scam. And no investigative reporter to be found. I am not surprised..

Thursday, November 27, 2008

US Economy Crissis in Management Study

In the beginning.

This is not a call for more regulation of the market place. Nor is it a call for less regulation of the market place. It is, rather, a call for more modesty and more honesty on the part of peddlers of comfort on the left and on the right of the political spectrum. I am calling for reform in all of the social sciences especially in economics and business. Let us give the end users of this product (i.e. academics pontification) a modicum of recourse, let there be some accountability in the market for ideas. Academic who wish to continue their intellectual auto-sexual activity are indeed free to do so at leisure and in private. It is when they expose their deeds to us, in the form of public policy advice, that they must be obliged to tell the whole truth or be liable for incompetence and worse. Incidentally, the author hastens to say that he is an academic economists and hence his criticism of them naturally applies to him.

It.
It is no exaggeration to say that the US economy has never blessed been with an appropriate management class. It started bad, with workers kidnapped as children from the streets of Europe during colonial days and sold into a lifetime of slavery in the colonies (no I am not talking about indentured service contracts). It continued on with ever weaker labor laws, and ever weaker consumer protection laws. All of this covered up by house economists singing the praises of a mythical market; praise that propagates the myth of self-correcting systems. There is no book or article in the academic literature that assigns the blame for economic failure to the arrogant invincible incompetence of the management class. Such reverence, recall the cheers that rose to meet: “what is good for GM is good for the US”, is born out of the labor management relationship that prevailed during colonial days and that continues to our day. It is the relation between master and slave with economists as the eunuchs guarding the harem and jumping for joy when a new master is born.

When the neoconservatives switched us from globalization to empire starting with the new millennium, they were acknowledging that US management class could not survive outside the Oxygen tent. What with actually competing with “them ferrners” for custom with no government holding the consumers hands behind the consumers back?. The only thing that made globalization work for the spoiled pampered incompetent managers, is that foreign lands did not enforce food and drug safety laws as rigorously as some parts of the US government did. But then two things happened: the US over the last 8 years quit being so picky about food safety and “ferrners” learned the art of selling us poison as food. So we switch to empires, but these are expensive and, history shows, are not publicly cost effective. Now what?

Pass a law that allows the public to sue economists and business school professors for damages due to incompetence. We do that for other professionals, so why not for these people?. If an engineer tells you that they have designed a car that uses no energy at all and you ask how? And they say that the design is based on the assumption that there is no friction. Then you laugh and leave the room. Behind the rhetoric used by most business school and economics professors is the assumption of perfectly working abstract markets that are constantly simultaneously at equilibrium. There should be a law.

In order for markets to “work” there needs to be recourse. If sellers harms buyer then buyer can fight back and seller faces consequences. If the buyer is dead or bankrupted due to the sale, then what do you mean: “recourse”.

In the business and economics writings, firms are eternal. They never are born nor do they die. Same thing with households. Financial constraints are as soft as soft can be, since no body is ever denied a loan and the only reason you work for others is that you find that to be more profitable than starting your own business. All you need to do to start up a business is go to the bank and show them your discounted net cash flow and they will hand over the cash. Remember that the only qualification you need to become a banker is to marry the spinster daughter of a banker who begot her by marrying the spinster daughter of a banker who begot her by marrying the spinster daughter of a banker who begot her by marrying the spinster daughter of a banker who begot her by marrying the ... We need help and helpers are too busy helping themselves to our food.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Letter from a Loony Economist

I hesitated to write because I needed to complete the research backing my bold proposals[i]. Then difficulties hit us and there is a scramble to the trough by all types of pigs. On the floor of the congress, some member was jumping up and down waiving a 5 page letter signed by 200 economists in support of his position[ii] . There indeed is a nearly total disjunct between words as used by economists and words as used by normal adults in talking about the economy. I have done lots of the research necessary for the proposals I make. It will take a lot of time to write up but I thought I would get it to you as soon as possible. I write this as a critic of economics, as an economist, but first and foremost as a citizen of this great country which IS the only realistic hope of humanity and which is THE country that not only espouses but continues to make progress living up to them.
So please receive this, a brief letter from an old economist who does not agree with many other economists because he [iii]never uses theory to refute facts.
Money and Banking. What to do Now
And we must do something now. The financial problem we face is that liquidity is crunched[iv]. Brokerage firms and Investment Banks have propagated the myth that trading in Wall Street is the same as INVESTMENT in the sense of creating additional capacity to produce goods and services in the economy. In fact just about the sum total of activity simply means transactions among holders of financial paper with hardly any money going to the creation of capacity to produce. You buy stocks from a holder of stock and you sell to another participant in the market for a capital gain or loss. The capital gain or loss is a misnomer because the actual physical stock of capital good is nearly untouched. So Wall Street is about churning money and hardly affects the economy. Yes it affects itself but the number of people working in Wall Street is insignificant and the income generated for the important players (who make incomes in the hundreds of millions) does not matter to the economy one ant’s earful of sawdust. I claim that if all the income(to investment bakers and brokerage houses)and jobs generated by wall street were to evaporate tomorrow then the effect on the economy as a whole is negligible[v].
Don’t bail out Wall Street Brokerage houses. Don’t bail out investment banks or any banks for that matter. And don’t nationalize them either. It is capitalism and let the market in financial services fix itself.
There is a liquidity crisis. And if we did not let JP Morgan have his way the last time around, then we would have been in a good position to fix things now. The Europeans, the Asians, the Africans, even the appendage called Australia HAVE proper central banks. We do Not. The Monstrosity called the Federal Reserve System is a joke[vi]. Now is not the time to fix it. Here is what we do.
I. Short term:
Create a Central Bank which eventually (in three years will take over the management of the US Monetary Policy)[vii]. For now it has only one function: Provide liquidity for all sectors except the financial sector. Bypass the fake failed false (other Fs available on demand) financial system. And let the embryonic central bank be CENTRAL. Existing commercial banks can borrow from central bank at a good interest rate. If that means they can’t function then new ones will spring up. If there is money in it, American entrepreneurs will do it. After things settle down, we sell the banking operation of the central bank to bidders. Privatize the banking operation of the central bank intelligently. The winning bidder should not win only on the basis of price, but must be qualified to run a bank (pray that they are new vigorous bank managers, where the qualification needed to be a banker is more than marrying a banker’s spinster daughter).
II. Long Term:
After things settle down we need to do the following:
1. Reform the management of monetary policy by going to a standard free standing Central Bank such as the one in European countries. Germany, France, and the UK have good models. It is insane to have the Fed owned by the member banks . Logic: Credit creation is infrastructural and can best be produced cooperatively. Confidence in the integrity of the financial system similar to national security. Bank regulation does not confiscate private property. It takes over something which is produced in common (confidence in money so it can be exchanged for assets) and manages it for the benefit of all. The Central Bank Governor should be a serious banker who got there by other means than marrying a banker’s spinster daughter. JP Morgan won’t like it but he was not the one that saved us this time. Warren Buffet made a good start, and he would like my suggestion because he loves his country more than he loves his money.
2. Reform the Management of Fiscal policy. Consolidate into one powerful department, all fiscal policy components: OMB, IRS, and Tresury Operations into one department responsible for producing and following up on a unified fiscal policy proposal for the President and for Congress. Entrust the new department to a powerful secretary (certainly, not an academic). The logic is that revenue and expenditure should be strongly connected and coordinated. While we are on the subject of reforming Treasury, move Tobacco and Fire Arms to Home Land Security so that the secretary of Treasury can focus on economic fiscal policy and leave the fighting of terrorists to the specialists. does not l
3. Reform Taxes: Go to a flat Federal tax which balances the budget with a 2 year lag. Each year we find out what we spent two years ago. Every economic agent (physiological or corporate) sends a post card to The New Department of Finance stating their income (no exceptions, no deductions, no mention of sources, no nothing). Add up all incomes. The tax rate is the ratio of what we spent two years ago to income last year. People with income below the poverty line get refunded the total amount paid. The cost of refund is added to the current year’s expenditures. All the energy of tax establishment will be spent on insuring the accurate reporting of income.
4. Enhance Transparency and Accountability. Enhance the post audit function of the GAO and insulate that process from political machination by making the chief post auditor’s appointment for life with a possibility of impeachment by 2/3 majority of both houses. Or establish an accounting chamber such as the one which we (Barents group with myself as project director) with help and guidance of Rudy Penner helped set up for the Russian Federation.


[i] Indeed, a lot of research has yet to be done so please think of the ideas I present for the short run as qukick fixes that need to be revisited when time allows
[ii] Let us see now, they are a dime a dozen so that will be two bucks and the letter waiver can keep the change. And they will say anything that they are paid to say because they have no rules of evidence and no external validation procedure. And they routinely use theory to refute facts. The exceptions are Veblenian heterodox economists.
[iii] My name is Mohamed A. El-Hodiri. Born in Egypt 1937. Educated in Egypt, Russia, and the US, I have taught economics and have been a working economist (not a comfort peddler) for the last 50 years in Egypt, Minnesota, Indiana Sudan, Russia, Kansas , and Kazakhstan. As a working economist I dealt with budgets. I am by training , an applied mathematician. I apply mathematics to economics. BY nature and training, I am an Institutional ist economist of the Veblenian Variety. So I am an Institutionalist mathematical economist. Spiritually I am a disciple of Rav Zalman Shachter. Academically I am a proud student of Leonid Hurwicz. My teachers (directly and indirectly via Hurwicz and Takayama) include Pontriagin, Kolmogorov, Uzawa, Oscar Lange, Lionel Mckenzie and Paul Anthony Samuelson. I have chaired the PhD dissertations of 40 wonderful economists and that is what I am most proud of.
[iv] There is a liquidity shortage because credit is a public good that can not and should not be privately supplied without strict regulation.
[v] Please remember that if all of wall street was to disappear tomorrow, the shares in productive firms and the and securities backed by bona fide firms are still going to be there. You only lose the cashier, NOT the cash unless they stole as they packed their satchels.
[vi] And to make matters even more hilarious, it is headed by an academic who is an ideologue
[vii] If the idea of a new bank does not appeal to you the authorize the secretary of Treasury to be the banker for now.

Welcome to the Internet

This is a test post for Mohamed El Hodiri, an economist who doesn't like many (any?) economists. He will write in this space about why this is case. And other thoughts.

He is launching his first blog.